mioty vs. LoRa-FHSS

Which technology is performing better?

mioty vs. LoRa-FHSS

Which technology is performing better?

A Study Report by

Discover the Future of Connectivity: Download the new mioty Study Report!

This study evaluates LoRa-FHSS performance against classical LoRa and mioty through comprehensive literature reviews. LoRa-FHSS, similar to mioty, uses frequency hopping and forward error correction but differs entirely from classical LoRa in its physical layer. Classical LoRa transceivers cannot decode LoRa-FHSS, which relies on a software-defined radio approach, making it suitable only for uplink due to its high decoding complexity.

LoRa FH-SS addresses the problem LoRa has with network capacity, making LoRa FH-SS 100 times better. But it comes at a high price:

  • Energy consumption is 40% higher than LoRa SF12 (making it 6 times more power hungry than mioty!)

  • Sensitivity goes down 3dB in comparison with LoRa SF12 (lowering the range)

  • Transmission and on-air time goes up (limiting the no of messages allowed to send within the duty cycle limitations)

  • The header bursts are not robust, making LoRa FH-SS vulnerable to noise, especially classical LoRa signals (LoRa will disturb LoRa FH-SS messages!)

Access the study report today to uncover the objective insights into mioty’s strengths and optimize your understanding of LPWAN possibilities. Download now and elevate your connectivity strategies!

Upon submitting this form, you will receive an e-mail to confirm that you are registered to our newsletter and that we may use your personal information to contact you. The e-mail will include a link enabling you to agree to these terms and download the study report. For more information, please see our privacy policy.